<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mad men and the machines that love them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:41:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Panu Horsmalahti</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Panu Horsmalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>You have the problem that you see intelligence as something magical quantum freewill dust, not a strictly mechanical process. An intelligence does exactly as it is programmed/created, therefore in the vast space of minds there are many that are &quot;Friendly&quot;, and many that are not. I have no idea what Marxian &quot;false consciousness&quot; has to do with anything, or feminism for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have the problem that you see intelligence as something magical quantum freewill dust, not a strictly mechanical process. An intelligence does exactly as it is programmed/created, therefore in the vast space of minds there are many that are &#8220;Friendly&#8221;, and many that are not. I have no idea what Marxian &#8220;false consciousness&#8221; has to do with anything, or feminism for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaj Sotala</title>
		<link>http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaj Sotala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellyramsey.net/index.php/2007/11/12/mad-men-and-the-machines-that-love-them/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Engineer a subclass of sentients so that it puts its considerable potential to work in service of humanity - because it’s convinced it wants to? Doesn’t this strike you as incredibly vile?&lt;/i&gt;

What would you propose as a more ethical alternative, then? Letting their wants be determined by random chance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Engineer a subclass of sentients so that it puts its considerable potential to work in service of humanity &#8211; because it’s convinced it wants to? Doesn’t this strike you as incredibly vile?</i></p>
<p>What would you propose as a more ethical alternative, then? Letting their wants be determined by random chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
